Fission Dynamics: The Quest of a Temperature Dependent Nuclear Viscosity

Authors

  • E. Vardaci Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Napoli, 80126, Italy
  • A. Di Nitto Johannes Gutenberg- Universität Mainz Institut für Kernchemie, Mainz, Germany
  • P. N. Nadtochy Omsk State University, Mira prospekt 55-A, Omsk 644077, Russia
  • A. Brondi Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Napoli, 80126, Italy
  • G. La Rana Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Napoli, 80126, Italy
  • R. Moro Dipartimento di Fisica, Università degli Studi di Napoli “Federico II”, and Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Napoli, 80126, Italy
  • M. Cinausero Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro dell’Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Legnaro (Padova), 35020, Italy
  • G. Prete Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro dell’Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Legnaro (Padova), 35020, Italy
  • N. Gelli Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare, Sesto Fiorentino (Firenze), 50019, Italy
  • E. M. Kozulin Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia
  • G. N. Knyazheva Flerov Laboratory of Nuclear Reactions, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, RU-141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2013.11001

Keywords:

fission dynamics, nuclear viscosity, dynamical models, intermediate fissility systems, charged particle multiplicities

Abstract

This paper presents a journey within some open questions about the current use of a temperature dependent nuclear viscosity in models of nuclear fission and proposes an alternative experimental approach by using systems of intermediate fissility. This study is particularly relevant because: i) systems of intermediate fissility offer a suitable frame-work since the intervals between the compound nucleus and scission point temperatures with increasing excitation energy are much smaller than in the case of heavier systems, ii) the dependence of viscosity on the temperature may change with the fissility of the composite system; iii) the opportunity to measure also observables in the evaporation residues channel translates into a larger set of effective constraints for the models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

D. Hilscher and H. Rossner, Ann. Phys. (France) 17, 471 (1992), and references therein. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/anphys:01992001706047100

A. Gavron et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1255 (1981). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.1255

M. Kildir et al., Z. Phys. A 306, 323 (1982). http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01432373

A. Gavron et al., Phys. Rev. C 35, 579 (1987). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.35.579

D. J. Hinde et al., Phys. Rev. C 39, 2268 (1989). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.39.2268

D. J. Hinde et al., Phys. Rev. C 45, 1229 (1992). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.45.1229

J. P. Lestone et al., Nucl. Phys. A 559, 277 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(93)90192-Z

M. Thoennessen and G. F. Bertsch, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 71 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.4303

A. Saxena et al., Phys. Rev. C 49, 932 (1994). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.49.932

D. J. Hofman et al, Phys. Rev. C 51, 2597 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.51.2597

A. Chatterijee et al, Phys. Rev. C 52, 3167 (1995). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.52.3167

L. Fiore et al., Nucl. Phys. A 620, 71 (1997). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0375-9474(97)00154-1

V. A. Rubchenya et. al, Phys. Rev. C 58, 1587 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.58.1587

I. Dioszegi et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 024613 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.024613

B. B. Back et al. Phys. Rev. C 60, 044602 (1999). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.60.044602

N. P. Shaw et al., Phys. Rev. C 61, 044612 (2000). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.61.044612

A. Saxena et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 64601 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.064601

G. La Rana et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 16, 199 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2002-10091-y

J. Cabrera et. al, Phys. Rev. C 68, 34613 (2003).http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.68.034613

A. Kramer, Physica (Amsterdam) 7, 284 (1940). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0031-8914(40)90098-2

P. Grangé et al., Phys. Rev. C 27, 2063 (1983). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.27.2063

A. J. Sierk et al., Phys. Rev. C 21, 982 (1980). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.21.982

T. Wada et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3538 (1993). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.70.3538

C. Bhattacharya et al., Phys. Rev. C 53, 1012 (1996). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.53.1012

P. Frobrich and I. I. Gontchar, Phys. Rep. 292, 131 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-1573(97)00042-2

A. K. Dhara et al., Phys. Rev. C 57, 2453 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.57.2453

A. V. Karpov et al., Phys. Rev. C 63, 54610 (2001). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.63.054610

G. Chaudhuri and S. Pal, Phys. Rev. C 65, 54612 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.054612

P. Frobrich and I. I. Gontchar, Europhys. Lett. 57, 355 (2002). http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/epl/i2002-00467-y

P. N. Nadtochy et al., Phys. Rev. C 65, 64615 (2002).http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.65.064615

P. N. Nadtochy et al., Phys. Lett. B 685, 258 (2010).http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.20Http://dx.doi.org/10.01.069

W. Ye, Progr. Theor. Phys. 109, 933 (2003). http://dx.doi.org/10.1143/PTP.109.933

C. Badimon, Ph.D. Thesis.- CENBG, Bordeaux, (2001).

E. Vardaci et al., Proceedings of the International Symposium on Dynamics Aspects of Nu-clear Fission, Casta-Papiernicka, Slovak Republic, Oct 1998, eds. Yu. Ts. Oganessian, J. Kliman, S. Gmuca (World Scientific Co., Singapore, 2000) p. 261.

M.G. Itkis, A. Ya. Rusanov, Phys. Part. Nucl. 29, 160 (1998). http://dx.doi.org/10.1134/1.953064

E. Vardaci et al, AIP Conf.Proc. 1175, 57 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3258266

A. Di Nitto et al., AIP Conf.Proc. 1175, 346 (2009). http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.3258249

E. Vardaci et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 43, 127 (2010). http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2009-10912-5

P. N. Nadtochy et al., EPJ Web Conf. 2, 8003 (2010).http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/20100208003

A. Di Nitto et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 47, 83 (2011). http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2011-11083-6

E. Mordhorst et al., Phys. Rev. C 43, 716 (1991). http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.43.716

Downloads

Published

2013-08-09

How to Cite

(1)
Vardaci, E. .; Nitto, . A. D. .; Nadtochy, P. N. .; Brondi, A. .; Rana, G. L. .; Moro, R. .; Cinausero, M. .; Prete, G. .; Gelli, N. .; Kozulin, E. M.; Knyazheva, G. N. . Fission Dynamics: The Quest of a Temperature Dependent Nuclear Viscosity. J. Nucl. Phy. Mat. Sci. Rad. A. 2013, 1, 1-11.

Issue

Section

Articles