Enhanced Fission Probability of Even-Z Fragments in the Decay of Hot and Rotating 210Rn* Compound System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2021.91008Keywords:
Compound nucleus, Heavy-ions reactions, Mass and Charge distribution of the cross-section and odd-even staggering, Isotopes, Fission, Mass, Shell, Cross section, Fragments, NucleusAbstract
Mass and charge distribution of the cross-section for the fission fragments obtained in the decay of hot and rotating compound system formed in the reaction 48Ca + 162Dy → 210Rn* at an incident energy 139.6 MeV has been calculated using the dynamical cluster-decay model. Isotopic composition for each element belonging to the symmetric mass region has been obtained. The shell closure at N=50 for light and at Z=50 for heavy mass binary fragments gives a deep minima in the fragmentation potential at touching configuration and governs the fission partition of the compound system. The fission fragments of the symmetric mass region have their dominating presence along with strong odd-even staggering i.e., even-Z fission fragments are more probable than the odd ones, similar to the observed trends of the yield.
Downloads
References
E. M. Kozulin, M. G. Itkis and G. N. Knyazheva, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 282, 012008 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/282/1/012008
A. N. Andreyev, K. Nishio and K.-H. Schmidt, Rep. Progr. Phys. 81, 016301 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa82eb
P. Möller, J. Randrup, A. Iwamoto and T. Ichikawa, Phys. Rev. C 90, 014601 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.014601
J. P. Blocki, H. Feldmeier and W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phys. A 459, 145 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(86)90061-8
D. S. Verma, Nucl. Phy. A 1003, 122031 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2020.122031
R. K. Gupta et al., Phy. Rev. C 71, 014601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.014601
R. K. Gupta et al, J. Phys. G. Nucl. Part. Phy. 32, 345 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1088/0954-3899/32/3/009
D. S. Verma and Kushmakshi, Nucl. Phy. A 995, 121690 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2019.121690
H. Kroger and W. Scheid, J. Phy. G, Nucl. Phy. 6, L85 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4616/6/4/006
N. J. Davidson et al., Nucl. Phy. A 570, 61 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)90269-0
D. S. Verma and Kushmakshi, J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 322, 139 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06497-7
W. D. Myers and W. J. Swiatecki, Nucl. Phy. 81, 1 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1016/0029-5582(66)90639-0
J. Blocki, J. Randrup, W. J. Swiatecki and C. F. Tsang, Ann. Phys. 105, 427 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(77)90249-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dalip Singh Verma, Kushmakshi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
 |
Journal of Nuclear Physics, Material Sciences, Radiation and Applications by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://jnp.chitkara.edu.in/ |
