Assignment of the spin and parity to the excited states of the (85-86)^Rb nuclei

Authors

  • Anuj Singh Department of Physics & Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
  • S. Kumar Department of Physics & Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
  • Neelam ' Department of Physics & Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
  • S. K. Mandal Department of Physics & Astrophysics, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
  • Naveen Kumar Govt. Degree College, Haripur, Kangra, Himachal Pradesh, 176028
  • S. Saha Department of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400005
  • J. Sethi Department of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Mumbai, 400005
  • T. Trivedi Department of Pure and Applied Physics, Guru Ghasidas University, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, 495009
  • H. Chutani Department of Physics, Hansraj College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007
  • M. Goyal Department of Physics, Shyam Lal College, University of Delhi, Delhi-110007

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2022.92023

Keywords:

Spin and Parity to the Excited States, coincidence, polarization asymmetry, spin and parity

Abstract

Background: The isotopes of Rb (Z=37) are one proton away from semi-magic (Z=38) proton number and deficits the characteristic of a spherical nucleus. In the 85,86Rb nuclei, the γ-ray spectroscopy are already performed and given an indication of Magnetic Rotation (MR) which usually observed in nearly spherical nuclei. The angular correlation measurements were used to find the spin and parity of the states.
Purpose: To confirm the spin and parity of the states in both the nuclei using Directional Correlation of Oriented (DCO) states ratio and polarization asymmetry (Δ) measurements.
Methods: The excited states of the 85,86Rb nuclei were populated via the 76Ge(13C,p3n/p2n) reaction at a beam energy of 45 MeV. The γ-rays emitted from the excited states were detected using Indian National Gamma Array (INGA) spectrometer at the Tata Institute of Fundamental Research (TIFR), Mumbai India.
Results: The values of the DCO states ratio and polarization asymmetry (Δ) were obtained and utilized to confirm the spin-parity of the states in the 85,86Rb nuclei. The polarization asymmetry (Δ) values were obtained for the first time using Compton-suppressed clover detectors.
Conclusions: In 85Rb, the spin and parity of 3491.1-, 4135.4-, 4757.2- and 5419.3 keV levels
are confirmed and for the 5312.2-, 5611.8 and 6335.9 keV states, only the spin is established. The mul-tipolarity assignment of the 224.3-, 331.5-, 732.8-, 778.1-, 865.4-, 973.5-, 1002.4-,
1427.5-, 1453.7-, 1598.2-, 1814.1- and 1881.5 keV γ-ray transitions allowed to confirm the spin
and parity of most of the levels above the 6- isomer in 86Rb.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

L. Lühmann, K.R Lieb, C.J. Lister, B.J. Varley, J.W. Olness and H.G. Price, Europhys. Lett. 1, 623 (1986). http://dx.doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/1/12/003

J. Panqueva, H.P. Hellmeister, L. Lühmann, EJ. Bergmeister, K.P. Lieb and T. Otsuka, Nucl. Phys. A 389, 424 (1982). http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(82)90527-9

J. Heese, K.R Lieb, L. Ltihmann, S. Ulbig, B. Wörmann, D. Alber, H. Grawe, H. Haas and B. Spellmayer, Phys. Rev. C 36, 2409 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.36.2409

L. Lühmann, M. Debray, K.P. Lieb, W. Nazarewicz, B. Wörmann, J. Eberth and T. Heck, Phys. Rev. C 31 828 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.31.828

H. Schfifer, A. Dewald, A. Gelberg, U. Kaup, K.O. Zell and R von Brentano, Z. Phys. A 293 85 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01414787

J. Döring, L. Funke, R. Schwengner and G. Winter, Phys. Rev. C 48, 2524 (1993).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.48.2524

R. Schwengner, J. Döring, L. Funke, H. Rotter, G. Winter, A. Johnson and A. Nilsson, Nucl. Phys. A 486, 43 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(88)90038-3

L. Funke, J. Döring, P. Kemnitz, P. Ojeda, R. Schwengner, E. Will, G. Winter, A. Johnson, L. Hitdingsson and Th. Lindblad, Z. Phys. A 324, 127 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)00488-9

J.W. Holcomb, J. Döring, T. Glasmacher, G.D. Johns, T.D. Johnson, M.A. Riley, EC. Womble and S.L. Tabor, Phys. Rev. C 48, 1020 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.48.1020

J. Döring, R. Schwengner, L. Funke, H. Rotter, G. Winter, B. Cederwall, F. Liden, A. Johnson, A. Atac, J. Nyberg, G.Sletten, Phys. Rev. C 50 1845, (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.50.1845

W. Gast, K. Dey, A. Gelberg, U. Kaup, E Paar, R. Richter, K.O. Zell and E von Brentano, Phys. Rev. C22, 469 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.22.469

C. Liu et al., Phys. Rev. C 100, 054309 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.100.054309

R. Schwengner et al., Phys. Rev. C 66, 024310 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.66.024310

R. Schwengner, G.Winter, J.Reif, H.Prade, L.Käubler, R.Wirowski, N.Nicolay, S.Albers, S.Esber, P.von Brentano, W.Andrejtscheff, Nuclear Physics A 584, 159-189 (1995).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0375-9474(94)00488-9

G. Winter, R. Schwengner, J. Reif, H. Prade, J. Döring, R. Wirowski, N. Nicolay, P. von Brentano, H. Grawe, and R. Schubart, Phys. Rev. C 49, 2427 (1994).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.49.2427

T.E Fazzini, P.R. Maurenzig, G. Poggi and N. Taccetti, Phys. Rev. C 25, 2309 (1982).

https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.25.2309

Alexandru Negret and Balraj Singh, Nucl. Data Sheets 124, 1-156 (2015).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.12.045

R. Palit, AIP Conf. Proc. 1336, 573 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3586167

R. Palit, et al., Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. A 680, 90 (2012).

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nima.2012.03.046

D. C. Radford, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 361, 297 (1995).

https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-9002(95)00183-2

W.T. Milner, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, http://www.phy.anl.gov/gammasphere/doc/damm.txt. (Pri-vate Communication). https://www.phy.anl.gov/gammasphere/doc/damm.txt

K. Starosta, T. Morek, Ch. Droste, S.G. Rohoziński, J. Srebrny, A. Wierzchucka, M. Bergström, B. Herskind, E. Melby, T. Czosnyka, P.J. Napiorkowski, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A 423, 16 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(98)01220-0

R. Palit, H.C. Jain, P.K. Joshi, S. Nagaraj, B.V. T. Rao, S.N. Chintalapudi, and S.S. Ghugre, Pramana J.Phys. 54, 347 (2000).

https://www.ias.ac.in/article/fulltext/pram/054/03/0347-0354

Balraj Singh and Jun Chen, Nucl. Data Sheets 116, 1-162 (2014).

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nds.2014.01.001

Downloads

Published

2022-06-20

How to Cite

(1)
Singh, A.; Kumar, S. .; ’, N.; Mandal, S. K. .; Kumar, N. .; Saha, S.; Sethi, J. .; Trivedi, T.; Chutani, H. .; Goyal, M. . Assignment of the Spin and Parity to the Excited States of the (85-86)^Rb Nuclei. J. Nucl. Phy. Mat. Sci. Rad. A. 2022, 9, 151-159.

Issue

Section

Conf_Articles