Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) Structural Susceptibility in the SARS-CoV-2 Virus Spike Protein Exposed to a Pulsed Electric Field
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2021.82023Palabras clave:
SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, Receptor-Binding Domain (RBD)Resumen
SARS-CoV-2 is responsible for causing the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which has so far infected more than thirty million people and caused almost a million deaths. For this reason, it has been a priority to stop the transmission of the outbreak through preventive measures, such as surface disinfection, and to establish bases for the design of an effective disinfection technique without chemical components. In this study, we performed in silico analysis to identify the conformational alterations of the SARS-CoV-2 Spike Receptor Binding Domain (RBD) caused by the effect of a pulsed electric field at two different intensities. We found that both stimuli, especially the one with the highest angular frequency and amplitude, modified the electrical charge distribution in the RBD surface and the number of hydrogen bonds. Moreover, the secondary structure was significantly affected, with a decrease of the structured regions, particularly the regions with residues involved in recognizing and interacting with the receptor ACE2. Since many regions suffered conformational changes, we calculated RMSF and ΔRMSF to identify the regions and residues with larger fluctuations and higher flexibility. We found that regions conformed by 353-372, 453-464, and 470-490 amino acid residues fluctuate the most, where the first is considered a therapeutic target, and the last has already
been characterized for its flexibility. Our results indicate that a pulsed electric field can cause loss of stability in the Spike-RBD, and we were able to identify the vulnerable sites to be used as a starting point for the development of viral inhibition or inactivation mechanisms.
Descargas
Citas
D. Wrapp, N. Wang, K.S. Corbett, J.A. Goldsmith, C.-L. Hsieh, O. Abiona, B.S. Graham and J.S. McLellan, Science 367, 1260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb2507
J. He, H. Tao, Y. Yan, S.-U. Huang and Y. Xiao, Viruses 12, 428 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/v12040428
Worldometers.info. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus
EPA de EE. UU. 2020. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/pesticide-registration/list-ndisinfectants-use-against-sars-cov-2
Food and Drug Administration EE. UU. 2020. https://www.fda.gov/media/136289/download
M.R. Robles-Lopez, R.R. Robles de la Torre, M. Camarillo-Cadena, A. Hernandez-Arana, J.S. Welti-Chanes and H. Hernandez-Sanchez, Revista Mexicana de Ingeniería Química (In English: Mexican Journal of Chemical Engineering) 11, 373 (2012).
J.P. Clark, Food Technology 60, 60 (2006).
W. Frey, C. Gusbeth, T. Sakugawa, M. Sack, G. Mueller, J. Sigler, E. Vorobiev, N. Lebovka, I. Álvarez, J. Raso, L.C. Heller, M.A. Malik, C. Eing and J. Teissie, Environmental Applications, Food and Biomass Processing by Pulsed Electric Fields, edited by H. Akiyama and R. Heller, Bioelectrics, (Springer, Tokyo, 2016) Chap. 6, pp. 389-476. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-56095-1_6
H.W. Yeom, Q.H. Zhang and G.W. Chism, Journal of Food Science 67, 2154 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2621.2002.tb09519.x
L. Barsotti, E. Dumay, T.H. Mu, M.D.F. Diaz and J.C. Cheftel, Trends in Food Science & Technology 12, 136 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00065-6
O.E. Perez and A.M.R. Pilosof, Food Research International 37, 102 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2003.09.008
R. Zhang, L. Cheng, L. Wang and Z. Guan, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science 34, 2630 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/TPS.2006.884800
B. Winter and M. Faubel, Chemical Reviews 106, 1176 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr040381p
S.A. Egorov, K.F. Everitt and J.L Skiner, J. Phys. Chem A 103, 9494 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp9919314
A.C. Walls, Y.J. Park, M.A. Tortorici, A. Wall, A.T. McGuire and D. Veesler, Cell 181, 281 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058
D.R. Hekstra, K.I. White, M.A. Socolich, R.W. Henning, V. Šrajer and R. Ranganathan, Nature 540, 400 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature20571
C. Peña-Negrete, M.A. Fuentes-Acosta, J. Mulia, L.A. Mandujano-Rosas and D. Osorio-González, Journal of Nuclear Physics, Material Sciences, Radiation and Applications 7, 189 (2020). https://doi.org/10.15415/jnp.2020.72024
Q. Wang, Y. Zhang, L. Wu, S. Niu, C. Song, Z. Zhang, G. Lu, C. Qiao, Y. Hu, K.-Y. Yuen, Q. Wang, H. Zhou, J. Yan and J. Qi, Cell 181, 894 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.045
Y. Wan, J. Shang, R. Graham, R.S. Baric and F. Li, Journal of virology 94, 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00127-20
J. Lan, J. Ge, J. Yu, S. Shan, H. Zhou, S. Fan, Q. Zhang, X. Shi, Q. Wang, L. Zhang and X. Wang, Nature 581, 7807 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2180-5
R. Melero et al., bioRxiv: the preprint server for biology 2020, (to be published). https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.08.191072
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
View Legal Code of the above-mentioned license, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode
View Licence Deed here https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
![]() |
Journal of Nuclear Physics, Material Sciences, Radiation and Applications by Chitkara University Publications is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. Based on a work at https://jnp.chitkara.edu.in/ |